XSI-AIMS Atlas™ · commercial product

One interface. Eight memory subsystems.

Procedural · Knowledge · Working · Episodic · Entity · Prospective · Reflective · Spatial

XSI-AIMS Atlas is the memory routing engine for the XSI-AIMS™ memory family. Agents call one interface; Atlas routes each call to the right subsystem and the right backend.

XSI-AIMS Atlas — the memory router A governed model at the center is fed by eight memory subsystems — Procedural, Knowledge, Working, Episodic, Entity, Prospective, Reflective, and the optional Spatial — each card naming the benefits it contributes: consistent execution with fewer regressions, grounded recall with fewer hallucinations, fast context isolated by design, auditable replayable history, bi-temporal entity facts queryable as-of any date with entity-graph memory demonstrated in production, kept commitments, compounding lessons, and optional topology awareness. Each card cites the published result behind it, and the shadow-governance ring cites the Yonsei finding that 94.4 percent of harness errors persist without governance. A deterministic Trust and Memory Provenance bus circulates promotion and provenance; shadow governance observes and restructures memory in flight. Deterministic flow underneath, inference only when it matters. XSI-AIMS ATLAS · THE MEMORY ROUTER Deterministic by default — inference when it matters. SHADOW GOVERNANCE · observe + optimize in flight ungoverned, 94.4% of harness errors persist · Shor · arXiv:2605.22505 TMS · deterministic bus — non-swappable GOVERNED MODEL inference when it matters PROCEDURALconsistent executionfewer regressions53→88% task successMUSE · arXiv:2605.27366 KNOWLEDGEgrounded recallfewer hallucinations0.06s multi-hop retrievalKDD 2026 · arXiv:2606.00610 WORKINGfast contextisolated by designsplit confirmed twicearXiv:2605.15701 + 27366 EPISODICauditable historyreplayable runs92% LoCoMo accuracyH-Mem · arXiv:2605.15701 ENTITYtemporal accuracyfacts as-of any dateentity-graph in productionMem0 · arXiv:2504.19413 PROSPECTIVEkeeps commitmentsdeadlines don't dropinstructions drop up to 50%Mittal · arXiv:2603.23530 REFLECTIVEcompounding gainslessons persist+30–37pp from structureUW-Madison · arXiv:2604.13151 SPATIALtopology · optionalplace + layout aware−66.7% hallucinationsTME · arXiv:2505.19436 deterministic flow inference moment shadow-governance optimize
eight memory feeds · one governed model · shadow governance optimizing in flight
Why Atlas

Memory shouldn't be a hard wire.

XSI-AIMS recognizes seven core memory subsystems plus an optional spatial profile. Each has different reliability, recall, and consistency needs. Agents should declare what kind of memory they need, not which database holds it. XSI-AIMS Atlas is the engine that makes that possible.

The problem

One vector store can't do eight jobs.

At prototype scale, memory never gets asked the hard question — one vector store and a generous context window carry a single demo agent fine. At fleet scale it dominates. A fleet puts tens or hundreds of agents in production, each making thousands of calls a day, and every call embeds a memory decision — what to read before acting, what to write after, where both should live. Multiply a per-call decision by fleet volume and memory becomes the highest-variance component in the stack.

The default architecture handles none of it, because the default architecture is one store — one vector database, one similarity-ranked access pattern, every kind of memory forced through it. That pattern is right for exactly one job — finding a relevant fact among many — and wrong for everything else agents remember. Reliability, recall, consistency, and cost diverge subsystem by subsystem. A skill retrieved at cosine similarity 0.71 is not a skill the operator can rely on. An audit record that can be overwritten is not an audit record. And the bill is unforgiving — memory mis-stored is paid for on every call, then ages in place with no consolidation path. Atlas routes each operation to a subsystem-appropriate store so the contract is declared, not improvised.

What the corpus shows

The research is converging.

In the MemGraphRAG team's KDD 2026 evaluation (arXiv:2606.00610), three published graph-RAG retrievers ran the same multi-hop benchmarks and landed roughly 180× apart on retrieval latency — 0.061 seconds per query at one end, 11.052 seconds at the other, HippoRAG between them at 1.586. That spread is the memory-complexity problem in one number — the variance between implementations is the cost of the missing contract, and the knowledge subsystem is where the field's energy already sits.

The convergence is sharper still. H-Mem (CUHK-Shenzhen and Huawei Cloud, arXiv:2605.15701) and MUSE-Autoskill (ByteDance, arXiv:2605.27366) each split working memory from episodic memory — independently, neither citing XSI-AIMS, in papers submitted within eleven days of each other. XSI-AIMS formalized that boundary as normative in the same weeks (RFC-0021, Accepted June 3, 2026). Two independent teams arriving at the same line is convergence, not influence — and it is claimed here as exactly that. The under-built layer was never another store. It is the routing and governance contract above the stores.

Go deeper

Read the whitepaper.

The full token economics, the consolidation and decay policies as declarable objects, and the eight-subsystem analysis behind this page are in the whitepaper — Memory Routing at Orchestration Scale. XSI-AIMS is an open standard — XSI-AIMS Atlas is the commercial engine that runs it.

Availability

Commercial. Contact-gated.

XSI-AIMS Atlas is licensed by XSI — reach out and we onboard your team directly.

XSI-AIMS registry integration

Conformance by declaration.

At registration time, XSI-AIMS Atlas declares which XSI-AIMS memory subsystems it serves and which backends are wired. The XSI-AIMS agent registry records the declaration and exposes it for conformance audit. Memory writes and reads are not exposed; the declaration of capability is.